Neurorights: towards a Philosophical Foundation.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6917081Keywords:
Neurorights, Neuroscience, LawAbstract
Today, it is an inescapable reality that advances in neurotechnology have experienced a significant advance, bringing to the fore the uncertainty surrounding the possibility of scrutinizing and even controlling the human brain, and along with it our emotions or thoughts. This reality has given rise to currents within the Law, which advocate the systematization and regulation of a set of rights associated with the protection and defense of a kind of indemnity or inviolability of "the mental". Even granting the category of fundamental human right to this series of so-called neuro-rights. The essay that follows aims to answer the question about what philosophical commitment exists behind a proposal for neurorights legislation. In order to elucidate such essential issues as the possibility of certainty about the existence of other minds, as a basic presupposition to formulate any type of regulation.
Downloads
References
Castro, Luis (2017). ¿Está presente el problema de las otras mentes en la filosofía de R. Descartes? Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología en Historia de las Ideas, N°11, pp. 47-56. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/INGE.58301
Consejo mexicano de neurociencias (2018). ¿Qué es la neurociencia cognitiva? Recuperado de https://www.consejomexicanodeneurociencias.org/post/qu%C3%A9-es-la-neurociencia-cognitiva
Cumpa-Valencia, Moisés. (2019). Usos y abusos del término “neurociencias”: una revisión sistemática en revistas indexadas Scielo. Revista
ConCiencia EPG, Vol. 4, N° 1, pp. 30-67. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.32654/CONCIENCIAEPG.4-1.3
Giménez-Amaya José Manuel., Murillo, José Ignacio (2007). Mente y cerebro en la neurociencia contemporánea. una aproximación a su estudio interdisciplinar. Scripta Theologica Vol. 39, N°2, pp. 607-635. Recuperado de https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/scripta-theologica/article/view/11125
Ienca, Marcello., Andorno, Roberto (2017) Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, vol. 13, N°5, pp. 1-27. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
Maureira, Fernando (2019). La neurociencia cognitiva ¿una ciencia base para la psicología? Teoría, Psiquiatría universitaria N°4, pp. 449-453. Recuperado de http://maureiralab.cl/gallery/8la%20neurociencia%20cognitiva%20base%20de%20la%20psicolog%C3%ADa.pdf
Narvaez, Maribel (2014). Neuroderecho: el sentido de la acción no está en el cerebro. Revista de Teoría del Derecho de la Universidad de Palermo, Vol. 1, N° 2, pp. 125-148. Recuperado de https://www.palermo.edu/derecho/pdf/teoria-del-derecho/n2/TeoriaDerecho_Ano1_N2_06.pdf
Organización de los Estados Americanos, Informe Anual Corte IDH (2001). Caso “Villagrán Morales y otros contra Guatemala, p. 24. Recuperado de https://www.corteidh.or.cr/sitios/informes/docs/spa/spa_2001.pdf
Papineau, David (2020). Naturalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/naturalism/
Premack, David., Woodfruff, Guy (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 1, N° 4, pp. 515-526. Recuperado de https://carta.anthropogeny.org/sites/default/files/file_fields/event/premack_and_woodruff_1978.pdf
Robinson, Howard (2015). Dualism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/dualism/
Salas, Raúl (2003). ¿La educación necesita realmente de la neurociencia? Estudios Pedagógicos N° 29, pp. 155-171. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052003000100011
Scotto, Carolina (2017). Del problema de las “otras mentes” a la cognición social: una defensa de la epistemología naturalizada. Revista de Epistemología e Historia de la Ciencia, Vol. 1, N° 2. pp. 43-66. Recuperado de https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/afjor/article/view/16755/17075+&cd=2&hl=es-419&ct=clnk&gl=cl
Stoljar, Daniel (2017). Physicalism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/physicalism/
The NeuroRights Foundation (2022). Policy: Works at four levels. Recuperado de https://plum-conch-dwsc.squarespace.com/policypage
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
